Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 584
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 106

A comparative evaluation of oral health status among institutionalized totally blind children using different methods – A randomized clinical trial


Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, K D Dental College and Hospital, Mathura, India

Date of Submission26-Feb-2021
Date of Acceptance25-Oct-2021
Date of Web Publication14-Dec-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Rupali Shrivastava
Department of Pedoddontics and Preventive Dentistry, K.D. Dental College and Hospital, Mathura K D Dental College and Hospital, NH 2, Chatikara, Mathura - 281 001, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.363565

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: To compare and evaluate the oral hygiene status among institutionalized visually impaired children using the Verbal, Braille, and Audio-Tactile method.
Materials and Methods: The present study was a single-blinded, randomized clinical trial with a total of 96 visually impaired children both male and female, aged 6–16 years old were included in this study from a residential school for blind. They were divided into three groups: Group 1 − Verbal method, Group 2 − Braille method, and Group 3 − Audio-Tactile method. Baseline oral hygiene scores were recorded using the debris index, calculus index, gingival index and hand scaling was performed for all the children. Fone's brushing technique was taught to all the groups and fluoridated toothpaste was given to the children with 3 and 6 months of follow-up. Periodic reinforcement of oral hygiene instructions was done for each group. The collected data were tabulated and analyzed using the ANOVA test with (P < 0.01).
Results: There was significant improvement in debris index, gingival index, and calculus index in all the three groups by the end of 6 months. All the three indices showed improvement in oral hygiene.
Conclusion: Visually impaired children could maintain a respectable level of oral hygiene when taught specialized methods. However, periodic reinforcement is mandatory for good oral hygiene maintenance. Hence, it is recommended to use the combination of Verbal, Braille, and Audio-Tactile method for the best treatment outcomes in these special children.

Keywords: Blindness, oral hygiene, positive reinforcement, questionnaire


How to cite this article:
Shrivastava R, Khanduja R, Gojanur S. A comparative evaluation of oral health status among institutionalized totally blind children using different methods – A randomized clinical trial. Dent Res J 2022;19:106

How to cite this URL:
Shrivastava R, Khanduja R, Gojanur S. A comparative evaluation of oral health status among institutionalized totally blind children using different methods – A randomized clinical trial. Dent Res J [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Jan 28];19:106. Available from: https://www.drjjournal.net/text.asp?2022/19/1/106/363565




  Introduction Top


Visual impairment constitutes a significant proportion among all disabled children. It is estimated that over 1.4 million children worldwide are living with visual impairment and India holds the largest population, i.e., 15 million.[1] "Blindness" is defined as visual sense <3/60, or a corresponding visual field loss to <10°.[2] Visual impairment includes both low vision, partial blindness, and blindness.

Visual impairment at a young age can have cynical effects on physical, neurological, cognitive, and emotional development[3] and when talking about oral health, it is an inevitable component of overall health so should not be ignored. Various studies stated increased gingival and periodontal diseases in visually impaired population as compared to the normal population.[4],[5] With probable reasons, these children lack in motor skills, proper brushing technique, good education, rely totally on their guardian, lack of public awareness, and motivation for these children which shows higher prevalence of dental diseases.[6]

To adapt to certain situation visually impaired individuals depend much on sound, speech, and touch.[7] Few of the previous data have focused much on improving oral hygiene skills[8],[9] rather than their knowledge and importance of oral health. It is important to conduct programs on oral health promotion and preventive treatments that ensure patients with visual impairment have appropriate information regarding oral health care and its provision. Modification in oral health education by using alternative teaching aids such as use of Braille pamphlet, oral health talk, chemical plaque control, individual care, and training can be helpful in maintaining oral health.[10]

Techniques such as this should be designed in such a way that helps in the elimination of dental biofilm, functionality, and conservation of dental elements. To motivate these visually challenged individuals is a major challenge for dental personnel. Thus, the use of substitute teaching aids such as verbal, tactile, and oral health talk through an educative, interactive questionnaire session can be beneficial in providing good oral hygiene practice to the visually impaired children. Therefore, the aim was to compare the oral hygiene status among institutionalized totally blind children of age 6–16 years using verbal method, braille method, and Audio-Tactile method in the Gwalior city of Madhya Pradesh located in Central India.


  Materials and Methods Top


The present study was a single-blinded, randomized clinical trial. It was carried out on 96 visually impaired school children of 6–16 years in Madhya Pradesh, India. Permission was obtained from the residential institution for visually impaired children. The study procedure consisted of a baseline data, interventions, one reinforcement for allocated groups, and follow-up examinations after 3 and 6 months. Children were selected by the probability simple random sampling method and were divided into three groups [Table 1]. Study design and its purpose were explained to the school authorities, and former consent was procured by the parents/guardians of the children from the residential school for blind. An interactive session was conducted at the beginning of the study, in order to create a good rapport and understanding with the children. Documentation was done using a self-designed format that included personal details such as name, age, gender, and a questionnaire by reading out to students, assessing their knowledge about oral health practices and their constancy of regular dental visit.
Table 1: Group allocation

Click here to view


Before the start of the study, baseline data of debris index, gingival index, and calculus index were recorded for Groups I, II, and III. Two individuals who were trained and calibrated before beginning the study to eliminate interexaminer and intraexaminer bias, performed the interview and clinical oral examination. In addition, kappa statistics were done to test inter-rater reliability and agreement was found to be 90%. Entire clinical examination was carried out by single pediatric dentist. During the examination, the children were made to sit on a wooden chair with an artificial light illumination with the school staff standing in close vicinity. Scaling for each participant was done using hand scalers. Individually, each participant was explained Fone's brushing technique, maintenance of good oral hygiene, and brush their teeth twice daily. Medium manual toothbrushes and toothpaste (Colgate Company, USA 0.15% w/w fluoride ion) were given to all the participants. Caretakers in the institution were advised and instructed to make a check on all the participants of their daily brushing frequency. For verbal group, Fone's brushing technique and oral hygiene instructions were explained verbally in the local language (Hindi). For Braille group, Braille formatted oral hygiene instruction pamphlets were given and in Audio-Tactile group they were made to feel the teeth on a large sized dental model followed by brushing on the model using Fone's method with assistance. This was repeated until the children could perform with ease. Periodic reinforcement was performed for all the children at an 3 week's interval. Oral hygiene index using debris, calculus, and gingival index was recorded. Data obtained were entered into Excel sheet and analyzed using the SPSS version 22. Normality of the data was analyzed using the Kolmogorov − Smirnov test. Proportion was calculated using the Chi-square test to assess the relationship between the demographic (age and sex) variables and oral health status. ANOVA test was used to assess the difference between the groups and scores before and after health education.

Diagram below shows the CONSORT diagram depicting the flow chart of the study in [Figure 1].
Figure 1: CONSORT diagram

Click here to view



  Results Top


All the three groups were matched based on the age and sex of the visually impaired children, as depicted in [Table 2]. Self-designed closed-ended questionnaire was under taken to assess the knowledge about diet, knowledge about the maintenance of oral hygiene, and necessities of regular dental visits which showed that, most of the children had complete knowledge but lacked in applicability, as shown in [Table 3].
Table 2: Distribution of participants on the basis of age and sex

Click here to view
Table 3: Response to the questions by the study participants

Click here to view


At baseline, there was no significant difference seen between all the three groups for debris index, gingival index, and calculus index with F = 0.96 and P = 0.62. At the 3rd month time interval, there was a statistically significant difference seen with all the three groups for debris index with F = 2.36 and P = 0.042. At the 6th month time interval, there was significant difference seen for all the three groups for debris index, gingival index, and calculus index, as shown in [Table 4].
Table 4: Comparison of mean debris index, calculus index, and gingival index at different intervals

Click here to view


The comparison of bebris index, calculus index, and gingival index within the groups at baseline, till 6 months as shown in [Table 5].
Table 5: Comparison of debris index, calculus index, and gingival index for different groups at baseline and 6 months

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Education, in general, is one of the imperative factors responsible for behavioral change in children.[11] Particularly, oral health education is the key to prevent oral diseases, and it is always healthier to educate the school age group.[12] According to Zickert et al.,[13] schools are thought to be the most suitable environment to provide health information to children to achieve the goal of health education program. Hence, in this study, three different health education methods were undertaken by which these children could easily master the correct brushing technique.

The information obtained from the close-ended questionnaire related to their diet, knowledge about the maintenance of oral hygiene, and their visits to dentist, affirmed children are in institutionalized setting, they had knowledge but lack in applicability, although it did not influence the study results which was in accordance to Reddy et al.[14]

In accordance to the present study, Jain et al.[15] also stated that these children face difficulty in maintaining optimal oral hygiene. Along with the children, teachers were also given the demonstration of tooth brushing and importance of positive reinforcement to these children as they were in an institutionalized setting, thus receptive to learn new things. The relevance of positive reinforcement in improving the oral well-being has been explained in a study by Hebbal and Ankola[16] where they reported, meticulous training and reinforcement by health educators lead to success of oral health programs.

Modified bass technique is superior in cleansing the interproximal areas and gingival third surfaces,[17] but Fone's brushing technique proved to be simpler, easily understood and remembered by the children[18] thus it was undertaken in this study. Children were also kept on fluoridated toothpaste as it being a known weapon in the prevention of dental caries.

In the present study, all the groups were comparable with respect to gingival, debris, and calculus index before starting the study and significant improvement in indices values among all the groups was seen at the end of 6 months follow-up.

Verbal group showed drastic improvement from baseline to 6 months in oral hygiene maintenance. At the beginning, the children's oral health knowledge applicability was not appropriate, but eventually following education and motivation, there was a remarkable improvement seen which was in accordance to Mahantesha et al.[19]

A salient factor in the present study is the Braille-formatted oral hygiene instructions. Braille group had better performances at 3 months, and there was significant difference between the groups which was in accordance to Deshpande et al.[20] and Ganapathi et al.[21] who found that many students reached good score category who were initially classified as fair after using the Braille technique. Similar trend was seen in the current study where at the end of 6 months, the performance by the Braille group was not different when compared to other means. Braille group showed the least indices value at the end of 3 months follow-up with P = 0.001 but did not continue till 6 months with probable reason children kept losing the Braille pamphlet or some could not comprehend the scientific language as they have just started learning Braille at the age of 6 years.

In the present study, there was significant increase in hygiene index and customized methods such as Verbal and Audio-Tactile performance could maintain an admissible level of oral hygiene in visually impaired children which was in consonance to Krishnakumar et al.[22]

The Audio-Tactile group, dental models were given to children for better understanding of oral hygiene instructions which might be the reason it proved to be effective in improving the oral hygiene of these children as supported by Sreedevi et al.[23]

Keeping all the above points in mind, it is recommended to use a combination of verbal, braille text, and audio-tactile mode of oral health education to instill good oral hygiene practice in these special children, which was in accordance to Chowdary et al.[24] Proper education, motivation, and periodic reinforcement were the key behind this success.

Reducing the burden of oral diseases, especially among visually impaired population may have long-term benefits. Lack of time, knowledge, high cost, fear, and negative view point toward dental fraternity may prevent participants from availing appropriate dental treatment. Thus, special attention must be given to these underserved children by our dental fraternity.

What are the limitations of the study?

Further studies with larger sample size and longer duration follow-up must be conducted to evaluate and assess the retention of knowledge even after the discontinuation of oral health education.


  Conclusion Top


Oral health education along with the skills to maintain its hygiene delivers paramount benefits in improving oral hygiene status for these special kids. For best results, we recommend a combination of all three methods i.e., Verbal, Braille text, and Tactile performance as it can be an additional aid in providing impactful results for these children. Fones method along with the use of fluoridated toothpaste gave the best outcome as it was easily remembered and understood by the children. Emphasis on positive reinforcement and gentle reminders proves to be helpful. Hence, measures mentioned above might reduce the further complicated treatment needs and facilitate in reducing dental incapacity.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or nonfinancial in this article.



 
  References Top

1.
Thylefors B, Négrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, Dadzie KY. Available data on blindness (update 1994). Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1995;2:5-39.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Batshaw M. Children with Disabilities. 8th ed. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company; 2019.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Mariot SP, World Health Organization. Global Data on Visual Impairments. 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Nandini NS. New insights into improving the oral health of visually impaired children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2003;21:142-3.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
5.
Cheung M, Fung W, Kwan W. Dental care for visually impaired institutionalized older persons in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 2003;22:372-81.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Watson EK, Moles DR, Kumar N, Porter SR. The oral health status of adults with a visual impairment, their dental care and oral health information needs. Br Dent J 2010;208:E15.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Morsey SL. Communicating with and treating the blind child. Dent Hyg 1980;54:288-90.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Yalcinkaya SE, Atalay T. Improvement of oral health knowledge in a group of visually impaired students. Oral Health Prev Dent 2006;4:243-53.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kumar S, Konde S, Raj S, Agarwal M. Effect of oral health education and fluoridated dentifrices on the oral health status of visually impaired children. Contemp Clin Dent 2012;3:398-401.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
10.
Nilchian F, Rodd HD, Robinson PG. The success of fissure sealants placed by dentists and dental care professionals. Community Dent Health 2011;28:99-103.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Christensen GJ. Special oral hygiene and preventive care for special needs. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:1141-3.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Flanders RA. Effectiveness of dental health educational programs in schools. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;114:239-42.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Zickert I, Emilson CG, Krasse B. Effect of caries preventive measures in children highly infected with the bacterium Streptococcus mutans. Arch Oral Biol 1982;27:861-8.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Reddy VK, Chaurasia K, Bhambal A, Moon N, Reddy EK. A comparison of oral hygiene status and dental caries experience among institutionalized visually impaired and hearing impaired children of age between 7 and 17 years in central India. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2013;31:141-5.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
15.
Jain A, Gupta J, Aggarwal V, Goyal C. To evaluate the comparative status of oral health practices, oral hygiene and periodontal status amongst visually impaired and sighted students. Spec Care Dentist 2013;33:78-84.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Hebbal M, Ankola AV. Development of a new technique (ATP) for training visually impaired children in oral hygiene maintenance. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2012;13:244-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Smutkeeree A, Rojlakkanawong N, Yimcharoen V. A 6-month comparison of toothbrushing efficacy between the horizontal Scrub and modified Bass methods in visually impaired students. Int J Paediatr Dent 2011;21:278-83.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Harnacke D, Mitter S, Lehner M, Munzert J, Deinzer R. Improving oral hygiene skills by computer-based training: A randomized controlled comparison of the modified Bass and the Fones techniques. PLoS One 2012;7:e37072.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Mahantesha T, Nara A, Kumari PR, Halemani PK, Buddiga V, Mythri S. A comparative evaluation of oral hygiene using Braille and audio instructions among institutionalized visually impaired children aged between 6 years and 20 years: A 3-monthfollow-up study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015;5:S129-32.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Deshpande S, Rajpurohit L, Kokka VV. Effectiveness of braille and audio-tactile performance technique for improving oral hygiene status of visually impaired adolescents. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2017;21:27-31.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
21.
Ganapathi AK, Namineni S, Vaaka PH, K V, Das R, Devi M, et al. Effectiveness of various sensory input methods in dental health education among blind children – A comparative study. J Clin Res 2015;9:ZC75-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Krishnakumar R, Silla SS, Durai SK, Govindarajan M, Ahamed SS, Mathivanan L. Comparative evaluation of audio and audio – Tactile methods to improve oral hygiene status of visually impaired school children. Chrismed J Health Res 2016;3:55-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
  [Full text]  
23.
Sreedevi S, Shivaprakash PK. To compare audio and audio tactile methods in improving oral hygiene status and to check the efficacy of two brushing techniques in visually impaired children. Int J Curr Adv Res 2018;7:9589-92.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Chowdary PB, Uloopi KS, Vinay C, Rao VV, Rayala C. Impact of verbal, braille text, and tactile oral hygiene awareness instructions on oral health status of visually impaired children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2016;34:43-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
 
 
Search
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed260    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded42    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal