| REVIEW ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2022 | Volume
: 19
| Issue : 1 | Page : 108 |
|
|
Natural teeth wear opposite to glazed and polished ceramic crowns: A systematic review
Tahereh Ghaffari1, Fahimeh Hamedi Rad2, Afshin Goftari3, Fariba Pashazadeh4, Kosar Ataei5
1 Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Dental Materials Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
3 Dentist, Private Practice, Tabriz, Iran
4 Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
5 Dental Student, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Tahereh Ghaffari
Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Golgasht Ave, Tabriz
Iran
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.363567
|
|
|
It is a major concern to select a proper ceramic with acceptable strength and esthetic and minimum antagonist wear. Therefore, different ceramics were introduced to obtain these advantages with various surface treatments. The aim of this study is to evaluate and report the wear behavior of polished and glazed feldspathic and zirconia crowns in published articles up to 2020. Five electronic databases which were used in this research were MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus from the starting date of databases to January 2020. The Keywords “zirconia,” “feldspathic,” “dental ceramic,” “enamel,” “Y-TZP,” “wear,” “glazed,” and “polished” were used. English articles were selected in this paper. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was used as a reporting template as much as possible. Among the initially 133 articles, 59 duplicated articles were removed, and finally, 52 articles were screened and among them, only 16 articles remained for full-text regaining. The results showed that zirconia had significantly less antagonist wear than feldspathic groups, and polishing had less enamel wear than other types of surface treatment like glazing. Only one study showed that glazed zirconia can have more antagonist wear than feldspathic porcelain. Monolithic zirconia had less enamel wear than conventional zirconia and low-fusing feldspathic porcelain showed lower antagonist wear in comparing with other types of feldspathic porcelains.
|
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
