|
 
 |
| REVIEW ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2023 | Volume
: 20
| Issue : 1 | Page : 30 |
|
Attitude of dental students toward evidence-based dentistry in Iran: A systematic review
Imaneh Asgari1, Hanieh Farahmand2, Ali Ahmady3, Maryam Zahed4
1 Department of Oral Public Health, Dental Material Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
3 Department of Oral Public Health, Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran
4 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| Date of Submission | 14-Nov-2021 |
| Date of Acceptance | 19-Dec-2022 |
| Date of Web Publication | 14-Feb-2023 |
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Maryam Zahed
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz
Iran
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.369632
Background: Dentistry practice has become more complex and challenging in the recent years. The clinical decision-making process has experienced many problems due to changing socioeconomic patterns, knowledgeable patients, rapid technological advances, and information explosion. The present study reviewed the status of the attitude toward evidence-based dentistry (EBD) among dental students of Iran Universities. The effect of the educational intervention was also assessed.
Materials and Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis checklist. Search strategy was developed by Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords surfing electronic available databases including Medline/PubMed and Google Scholar and local databases such as Scientific Information Database (SID) and Magiran. Two reviewers read the abstracts of all eligible papers and excluded the duplicates. They extracted the information of the full-text of the studies included in the review and assessed the quality by Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist.
Results: Ten studies including 8 cross-sectional and 2 interventional studies met the criteria. The assessment of the attitude of 937 dental students from a different region of the country toward EBD showed moderate to acceptable status using 3 different tools. In regard to educational interventions, 2 studies were successful to improve their attitude.
Conclusion: Although the researchers presented good scores on the attitude questionnaires, the quality of the study tools, the eligible criteria for recruiting the participants and the method of evaluating the construct of attitude should be investigated in future studies.
Keywords: Attitude, dental students, evidence-based dentistry, Iran
How to cite this article:
Asgari I, Farahmand H, Ahmady A, Zahed M. Attitude of dental students toward evidence-based dentistry in Iran: A systematic review. Dent Res J 2023;20:30 |
How to cite this URL:
Asgari I, Farahmand H, Ahmady A, Zahed M. Attitude of dental students toward evidence-based dentistry in Iran: A systematic review. Dent Res J [serial online] 2023 [cited 2023 Sep 23];20:30. Available from: https://www.drjjournal.net/text.asp?2023/20/1/30/369632 |
| Introduction | |  |
Evidence-based dentistry (EBD) is defined by the American Dental Association (ADA) as an approach to oral health care that requires the integration of systematic assessments of clinically relevant scientific evidence, relating the patient's medical history and oral condition, with the dentist's clinical expertise and the patient's treatment needs. As it is clearly seen, the ADA points out three main areas in EBD: (1) relevant scientific evidence, (2) patient needs and preferences, and (3) dentists' clinical expertise.[1]
EBD helps to minimize personal faults, reassures the best clinical decision making for the patient, and uses available sources more effectively. Dentists need to make daily decisions regarding patient care. These decisions should essentially be scientifically sound. EBD is meant to empower clinicians to provide the best contemporary treatment.[2]
EBD is a means of lifelong learning in which clinicians base their decisions on evidence rather than opinions and are able to continuously monitor and develop their clinical skills and performance. EBD provides some advantages in which dentists can pursue more secure, effective, and cost-effective treatment.[3]
General dental students can attend EBD courses to learn the required dentistry skills based on evidence.[4] Previous studies in Tehran Iran show that despite good attitudes about EBD, there was a deficiency in students' knowledge and awareness.[5] Dental faculty members were also investigated in this matter indicating a moderate level of actual knowledge about the basic principles of EBD.[6]
EBD is a mutual responsibility for both researchers and therapists. As we expect a dentist to apply the most contemporary evidence in the clinic and to choose the best treatment method and applied materials accordingly, we should also expect a researcher to design and implement studies accurately without bias. On the other hand, scholars should evaluate and criticize these trials through systematic reviews to manage high-volume information. Researchers should rank data within clinical studies and academic papers to prevent any bias in the validity of academic researches and papers. In this case, designed studies like systematic reviews can be generalized clinically by removing the gap between research and clinical study.[7]
Reforms and changes in dentistry courses are implemented to educate many dentists to provide oral health cares for patients whilst having academic capacity and skills for the management of clinical trials. Some changes also have other advantages, including a deeper understanding of the association between medical sciences and dentistry, society needs-based courses, academic-critical thinking skills, creating continuous education, and evidence-based trials for dental students.[8]
Dentistry faculties also should pave the way for the education of thoughtful graduates who can solve problems and use research findings to be lifelong learners.[9]
Since 2010 EBD practice has been included in the new dentistry curriculum of the Iranian Dental Schools. In line with other countries, different content and methods have been applied for training this course in all dental schools. Several researchers conducted studies on EBD in Iran by different perspectives including knowledge, attitude, and application. Since this is a new approach in the curriculum; it should be evaluated and discussed based on scientific principles. The purpose of this study was to collect and compare the available evidence regarding the attitude of Iranian dental students about EBD and the effects of EBD dental courses on their attitude. This systematic review can help designers of dental curriculums in Iran and other regions to find the gap in EBD courses.
| Methods | | |
Search strategy
The core search strategy was developed based on the Medical Subject Heading and the keywords of the article. A single reviewer performed the search in June 2021 on Medline (PubMed based) and Google scholar as international databases and Magiran, Scientific Information Database (SID) and Islamic World Science Citation (ISC) as local resources. English and Persian articles with publication years after 2010 by three main concepts “evidence-based dentistry,” “attitude,” “dental students,” and equivalent Persian phrases were applied for searching. The search strategy is explained in detail in [Table 1].
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria included English and Persian studies between 2010 and June 15, 2021, at any dental university or institute in Iran. The participants were dental students at any age or semester either undergraduate or postgraduate. The qualitative, cross-sectional, and interventional methods of research were considered. The articles which included dentists or faculty members were excluded.
Study selection and data extraction
At first, duplicates were removed by hand-searching. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts for eligibility. If the articles were about the knowledge, awareness, and skills of the students and there was not any outcome about their attitude or perception they were deleted from the list. Specific studies such as epidemiology, Internet or computer usage, and searching which were assessed as a field of EBD were excluded because the content did not cover our concept. Then, full texts of relevant articles were identified and read and the main parts were extracted as evidence presented in two different tables. The items for preparing and evaluating the formats of descriptive studies included the first author's name, year of publication, number of participants, place of the study, the items or statements related to the attitude, main outcome, or findings regarding the status of the attitude [Table 2]. For the interventional studies, the formats for assessment included first author's name, year of publication, number of participants, and place of the study, the items used for assessing the attitude, main outcome, or finding about the change of the attitude [Table 3].
Quality appraisal
The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies with 8 items[20] and the critical appraisal checklist for articles on educational studies with 13 items[21] were used for assessing the risk of bias by each of the 2 reviewers independently. They reported the results as articles included, excluded, or articles that seek further information. At the case of disagreement, they tried to reach a consensus or sought the opinion of a third reviewer. As this review intended to provide an overview of the evidence about EBD in dental education in Iran, we did not consider strict quality exclusions due to the limited amount of related studies. Therefore, all related articles regardless of quality level were included.
| Results | | |
One hundred and eighty-three records were identified in the international and local databases. The flow diagram of the process is explained as recommended by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis [Figure 1]. The abstracts were screened using the eligibility criteria. Finally, 10 English and Persian language articles were included in the review. A complete review of the articles was conducted and the results were summarized as two separate tables for descriptive and interventional studies as stated previously [Table 2]. | Figure 1: PRISMA flow chart of reports. PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis.
Click here to view |
Seven studies were cross-sectional[5],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16] and two were experimental or quasi-experimental by pre-post interventional design.[17],[18] In one study which was about the effectiveness of the education, the design was analytically cross-sectional, so it was included in the descriptive studies.[12]
The selected reports dated from 2012 to 2019 from the universities of Tehran, Isfahan, Tabriz, Mashhad, Kerman, Gilan, and Kermanshah. Study characteristics are presented in [Table 2]. In this table name of the first author, date of the publication, description of participants, the setting of the study, the variables related to the EBD attitude and the main findings were extracted.
In the descriptive group, four studies used the same questionnaire which was developed previously by Khami et al.[5] for the assessment of the attitude of dental students toward EBD. Two studies did not explain properly about their data collection tools, however, as they used a 12-item questionnaire it is expected to be the one developed by Khavid et al.,[14] and Sarani et al.[15] In one study, the questionnaire was the translated form of Hendricson et al.[13] A tool which was an assessment instrument designed to measure the outcomes of training in evidence-based practice (EBP) in the context of dentistry. Four EBP dimensions such as understanding of EBP concepts, attitudes about EBP, evidence-accessing methods, and confidence in the critical appraisal were considered by this instrument [Table 2].
Totally, 934 dental students were evaluated regarding their attitude toward EBD all around the country. The participants of 4 studies were in the 3rd year and above,[11],[12],[15],[17] two studies at the 5th or 6th year of their education,[5],[10] however, one study was among the postgraduate students[16] and one study in all of the senior and junior dental students[14] [Table 2].
Although different frequencies were reported for the responses to the questions of EBD attitude, the overall score was explained as positive/neutral/negative or good/moderate/poor. Relatively, all of the authors of these articles were satisfied by the status of dental students' perceptions or point of view. While the mean scores of attitude were near the median, some varieties in expressing the finding were related to the cut-points for transforming the quantitative numbers to a qualitative status such as low, moderate, high or favorable and unfavorable, positive or negative, and so on. Overall, 5 studies reported a good and positive attitude and 3 studies reported a moderate and neutral attitude [Table 2].
In two studies, the effectiveness of an educational program for changing the attitude of dental students was targeted. In one study, the short-term evaluation showed successful change between pre- and post-scores as well as intervention versus control group.[18] In another study, the changes in attitude score were less in comparison to the knowledge scores. They obtained a medium size effect in their analysis[19] [Table 3].
Critical appraisal
The methodology of the included articles was assessed basically. With regard to the eight items of the JBI checklist among the cross-sectional studies, 6 articles were at the medium level of quality and the quality of two articles was low. Regarding the interventional studies, the checklist developed by the University of Glasgow was applied. Both of the studies had good quality [Table 4] and [Table 5].
| Discussion and conclusion | | |
In the recent years, dentists are expected to keep up with the advancements in dental therapies, materials, and research. There is an overflow of research-based and even unreliable evidence supporting various aspects of dentistry on the internet. The gap between research and clinical dental practice needs to be filled and the information available to clinicians needs to be optimized. This can somewhat be met by formulating evidence-based clinical guidelines for best practices that the dentists can refer to with simple chairside and even patient-friendly versions.[1]
Despite the good attitude toward the application of EBP in dental work, the real work setting would be more challenging for new general dentists. As Neuppmann Feres et al. classified the barriers involved in the application of EBD into four categories: self-related, evidence-related, context-related, and patient-related barriers. Shortage of time and financial constraints were the barriers most frequently studied.[22] A study was conducted on self-assessment of students about their awareness, knowledge, and attitude at Tehran University in 2011, and results indicated that despite good attitudes about EBD there was a deficiency in students' knowledge and awareness. Accordingly, students were interested in the EBD course, while they had poor knowledge and awareness.[5] This is also true for the dental faculty, who are well-trained dentists and researchers; Sabounchi et al.[6] carried out a study on the knowledge and attitude of dental faculty members toward EBD. In this study, a total of 377 dental instructors indicated a moderate level of actual knowledge of the basic principles of EBD. Reference books, reviews, and core papers were used more, while the Cochrane library was used less.
The inconsistency between the self-reported status and real performance is presented in Ciancio et al.'s[23] study. 69% of dental practitioners transitioning to dental educators rated themselves better than satisfactory in their knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding EBD skills application. However, only 33%–42% of them indicated that they frequently used the evidence pyramid and systematically, objectively, and critically appraised the evidence.
This shows the importance of research in regard to the attitude and practice next to the knowledge about EBD in dental students.[24]
As Chiappelli concluded the most urgent and important of these is undoubtedly to craft and validate novel didactic and practical methodologies to teach EBD-both research and practice-to the next generation of dental researchers and clinical dentists and to optimize the integration of EBD in the dental curriculum.[25] A change in attitudes from negative to positive were found in Najafi's and Asgari's[19] study after intervention. Spallek et al.,[7] introduced the lack of students' desire to use EBD in clinical practice as the reason for such negative attitudes. They also believe that EBD should be incorporated into clinical practice to achieve a positive attitude in this context.
This systematic review showed that in all descriptive studies reported in Iran, dental students were involved only in a self-administered questionnaire survey for assessing the attitude toward EBD. Moreover, nearly all studies explained the status of Iranian dental students as satisfactory or acceptable. However, the quality assessment especially for the descriptive studies was mostly medium and poor.
As the review showed, most of the studies had applied the questionnaire tool which was developed by Khami et al.,[5] Since, in this questionnaire the researcher had drafted the questions and received the comments from a number of students, there was not any quantitative score of the validity or reliability for the finalized tool. From a critical view, it seems that some questions are more due to the awareness and knowledge of the persons about evidence-based process (statements 5, 6, 7, 8, 9) rather than their perspective of the evidence-based practice in dentistry. Regarding the importance of a precise tool and method to measuring the attitude, it would be suggested to use more qualified assessment tools for future studies. Furthermore, the need for a robust designing in descriptive studies exists. Moreover, other forms of educational program or intervention which is reflective of the real setting work should be examined in future studies.
Furthermore, the assessment of the students in the studies reflected in this review doubted to be problematic for several reasons. First, a close-ended sole questionnaire tool could not reflect the real belief and ideas of dental students of the importance, necessity, and practice of the evidence-based principles and process. Although it is common to apply a predesigned questionnaire to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) as KAP studies do, we should be more sensitive about the measurement of the attitude by a valid tool or method. Second, we have not seen a well-designed questionnaire tool in most studies. The items had not been gathered from a qualitative study among the target group or expert panel opinion. Furthermore, the details of the validation process were not explained properly. Thirdly, despite the good sample size and distri bution in the country, a significant percentage of the subjects did not involve students who were involved with real patients and clinical settings. Hence, they had no insight into the best use of evidence for decision-making of treatments [Table 2] and [Table 3].
In conclusion, this review showed that the attitude of dental students regarding EBD in Iran is fairly good. However, the validity of the studies is questionable. Therefore, well-designed future studies, using reliable tools of assessment, with greater sample size and more accurate selection of subjects are still needed to assess EBD in Iranian dental students and future dentists.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or nonfinancial in this article.
| References | | |
| 1. | Dhar V. Evidence-based dentistry: An overview. Contemp Clin Dent 2016;7:293-4.  [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 2. | Kwok V, Caton JG, Polson AM, Hunter PG. Application of evidence-based dentistry: From research to clinical periodontal practice. Periodontol 2000 2012;59:61-74. |
| 3. | Yusof ZY, Han LJ, San PP, Ramli AS. Evidence-based practice among a group of Malaysian dental practitioners. J Dent Educ 2008;72:1333-42. |
| 4. | Prabhu S, Joseph J, Saravanan S. Knowledge, attitude, and perceived barriers towards the practice of Evidence-based dentistry among Indian postgraduate dental students. IOSR J Den Med Sci 2012;2:46-51. |
| 5. | Khami M, Jafari A, Mohtashamrad Z, Yazdani R, Moscowchi A, Akhgari E, et al. Awareness, knowledge and attitude of dental students of Tehran and Shahid Beheshti Universities of Medical Sciences about evidence-based dentistry. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran 2012;24:251-8. |
| 6. | Sabounchi SS, Nouri M, Erfani N, Houshmand B, Khoshnevisan MH. Knowledge and attitude of dental faculty members towards evidence-based dentistry in Iran. Eur J Dent Educ 2013;17:127-37. |
| 7. | Spallek H, Song M, Polk DE, Bekhuis T, Frantsve-Hawley J, Aravamudhan K. Barriers to implementing evidence-based clinical guidelines: A survey of early adopters. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2010;10:195-206. |
| 8. | Ghasemi H, Zafarmand A, Nakhostin M. The evaluation of the Quality of Teaching Community Oral Health Course for Undergraduates in dental schools in Iran. J Mash Dent Sch 2013;37:55-64. |
| 9. | Iqbal A, Glenny AM. General dental practitioners, knowledge of and attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Br Dent J 2002;193:587-91. |
| 10. | Dehghani M, Bidar M, Movahhed T. Evaluation of awareness, knowledge and attitude towards evidence-based dentistry among dental students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. J. Mashhad Dent Sch 2016;40:47-58. |
| 11. | Taramsari M, Vadiati B, Attaran Mashhadi N, Bidar M, Dehghani M. Dental students' awareness, Knowledge and attitude towards evidence-based dentistry. J. Isfahan Dent Sch 2018;14:169-76. |
| 12. | Marvei Milan A, Vatanpour M, SHahsavari F. Evaluation of instruction effect on evidence-based dentistry (EBD) knowledge, attitudes, access and confidence and its consistency among dental students of Tehran Dental Branch, Islamic Azad University in 2017. Res Dent Sci 2018;15:136-44. |
| 13. | Hendricson WD, Rugh JD, Hatch JP, Stark DL, Deahl T, Wallmann ER. Validation of an instrument to assess evidence-based practice (EBP) knowledge, attitudes, access and confidence. J Dent Educ 2011;75:131-44. |
| 14. | Khavid A, BasamTabar M, Rahimi V. Assessment of awareness, knowledge, and attitude of dentistry students in Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences regarding evidence-based dentistry (EBD). Int J Sci Res Dent Med Sci 2019;1:48-51. |
| 15. | Sarani A, Sarani M, Abdar ME, Abdar ZE. Awareness, knowledge, and attitude of dentistry students in Kerman towards evidence-based dentistry. Electron Physician 2016;8:2366-70. |
| 16. | Pourkazemi M, Vafaei A, Erfanparast L, Alamgir P. A study of knowledge, attitude and self-assessment of residents on evidence-based dentistry at Faculty of Dentistry of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Res Dev Med Educ 2016;5:27-31. |
| 17. | Eslamipour F, Ghaiour M. Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice with regard to evidence-based dentistry among dental students in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. J Educ Health Promot 2016;5:12. |
| 18. | Khami M, Mohtashamrad Z, Razeghi S, Jafari A, Yazdani R, Moscowchi A. Development of an evidence-based dentistry course for dental students and its effect on their awareness, attitude and self-assessed knowledge. Iraqi Journal of Public Health. 2017;1(3). |
| 19. | Najafi NF, Asgari I. Effectiveness of a program on evidence-based dentistry in dental students. J Educ Health Promot 2017;6:34. |
| 20. | Joanna Briggs Institute. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools for Use in JBI Systematic Reviews Checklist for Analytical Cross Sectional Studies. North Adelaide, Australia The Joanna Briggs Institute. 2017 Mar 6. |
| 21. | Morrison JM, Sullivan F, Murray E, Jolly B. Evidence-based education: Development of an instrument to critically appraise reports of educational interventions. Med Educ 1999;33:890-3. |
| 22. | Neuppmann Feres MF, Roscoe MG, Job SA, Mamani JB, Canto GL, Flores-Mir C. Barriers involved in the application of evidence-based dentistry principles: A systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2020;151:16-25.e16. |
| 23. | Ciancio MJ, Lee MM, Krumdick ND, Lencioni C, Kanjirath PP. Self-Perceived knowledge, skills, attitudes, and use of evidence-based dentistry among practitioners transitioning to dental educators. J Dent Educ 2017;81:271-7. |
| 24. | Azad A, Talattof Z, Deilami Z, Zahed M, Karimi A. Knowledge and attitude of general dentists regarding common emergencies in dental offices: A cross-sectional study in Shiraz, Iran. Indian journal of dental research: Official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research. 2018;29(5):551-5. |
| 25. | Chiappelli F. Evidence-based dentistry: Two decades and beyond. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2019;19:7-16. |
[Figure 1]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]
|
Search Pubmed for